The second way of looking at pricing is to accept that we live in economically challenging times. It's more expensive than RTX 3080 and it delivers broadly comparable performance to the last-gen RTX 3090/3090 Ti as opposed to comprehensively besting them in the same way that RTX 3080 trounced the RTX 2080 Ti.

So in short, you get previous-gen flagship performance for $800, which in today's market doesn't seem all that bad.'įirst of all, if you're expecting the same kind of gen-on-gen improvements to performance alongside a significant price-cut, you're likely to be disappointed by RTX 4070 Ti. This is what Techspot had to say for 4K ' At 4K, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti was 7% slower than the 7900 XT and 3% slower than the 3090 Ti, but also 4% faster than the 6950 XT. We're also looking at a 5% boost on average over the 3090 Ti and 6950 XT, with a 13% increase over the 6900 XT and RTX 3090.' Based on everything we just saw, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is slightly slower than the 7900 XT on average, though it's just 4% slower which is very close for these two GPUs.

This is what Techspot had to say for 1440p 'Starting with the 1440p data, here's our 16 game average. And its much much better than FSR2 in motion or any other upscaler. Play Asseto Corsa Compatzione in native 4k and see how many artefacts it has compared to DLSS quality which reduces all the trails left behind the car. Sure there are few games with bad implementation but most of the time its literally as good or better.

Im using DLSS all the time and it looks literally as good or sometimes better than native 4K even in motion. Click to expand.I think you need to stop sniffin that white line.

Atomic heart rtx tech demo rtx 2070